Re: <documenta X><blast> aesthetics-ethics

Alan J Sondheim (sondheim@panix.com)
Tue, 22 Jul 1997 03:52:55 -0400 (EDT)

On Tue, 22 Jul 1997, Ricardo Basbaum wrote:

>
> about the problem of heterotopic brought into discussion by jordan,
> we might not forget that Foucault is specially concerned with disjunction,
> which leads his preocupations with the space between things and bodies.
> So it seems to me the heterotopic space is a disjunctive space.

This doesn't follow from the premises. I would say a space of concaten-
ation, which Quine among others analyzed.

If you insist on disjunction, then is it exclusive or inclusive?

> (the energy of disjunction is called 'divine' by Deleuze/Guattari)
> Being worried with the space between we enter into another kind of
> preoccupations as well, that is we can focus on what comes from one to
> the other, what is exchanged and what is produced directly to the environment:
> we come close to the problem of relationship.
> I think that perhaps we could add to Foucault's ideas about space the
> concept of psychological field, by Kurt Lewin, who linked topology and
> psychology. Lewin talked about psychological vital spaces, spaces linked
> to subjects. So we can conceive of any group of people as heterotopic spaces,
> as disjunctive spaces are superimposed . What makes a group of people react
> and relate to each other is trying to experience disjuntion and the space
> between, that is, maximum proximity and hetereogenity: a paradoxical, therefore
> imprevisible, non-linear experience.

I do think this is a misreading of Lewin; there is a difference,
fundamental, between fields and spaces, although they can interpenetrate.
And why "trying to experience disjunction" and not, for example, con-
junction, or any of the other fundamental logical operations?

All such can be reduced to the Sheffer stroke or its dual, not both a and
b, neither a nor b, which construct expulsion, re: Girard. But in spite of
this and Nicod, you can move in the other direction just as easily.

I would not know a heterotopic space if I fell through across beneath
within without transgressing wandering in/out of it.

Alan

> The invisible is the space-between, the forces. Etology and invisible, the
> movement of body/mind constructing space, heterotopic spaces and psychology.
> Ricardo Basbaum
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> a forum on spatial articulations, perspectives, and procedures
> texts are the property of individual authors
> for information, email majordomo@forum.documenta.de with
> the following line in the message body: info blast
> archive at http://www.documenta.de/english/blasta.htm
> or http://www.documenta.de/deutsch/blasta.htm
> documenta X Kassel and http://www.documenta.de 1997
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>