Re: <eyebeam><blast> images by ecriture

[Jordan Crandall <crandall@blast.org>]

Yukiko Shikata wrote:

>The moving images of this century were the static, linear (=syntax
>of images), but now we are facing with the change of moving images
>which are para- or multi-layered. Not only creating images by cut-ups, 
>remix, but here there emerges totally new "images by ecriture" which 
>cannot be controlled intentionally by ourselves. This new state of 
>images can be also said as "trajective (by P.Virilio)," beyond 
>"subjective" or "objective,"  which is in a kind of in-between state 
>and open to various possible ways of interrelatons, by transfering or 
>multiplying images by themselves. Those "images by ecriture" might
>change our perception and memories,  as memories can be always revised 
>or newly generated depending on the environments. In 21th centuries, a 
>neurotic, trajective communications might organise  the sphere of 
>interface.

Yukiko:  Could you explain more about this new state of images -- this
change in the moving image, this image refigured through patterns of
mobility?  And particularly, in terms of technology's relation to the
body as perceived in Japan.



-
-------------------------------------------------------------
a critical forum for artistic practice in the network
texts are the property of individual authors
to unsubscribe, send email to eyebeam@list.thing.net
with the following single line in the message body:
unsubscribe eyebeam-list
information and archive at http://www.eyebeam.org
Eyebeam Atelier/X Art Foundation http://www.blast.org
-------------------------------------------------------------