[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: <eyebeam><blast> Different Web Art
My initial contribution to the discourse of new information technologies
was on the question of the 'Other' in the digital age. However, I have
great difficulty with the concept of an ethno-designated internet, a
"western" or "other" internet. It makes little sense to me to think of a
very "western" internet, or of "others" on the net. For one such ideas
do no more than perpetuate the binary of the One and the Other which
some of us have fought outside virtual space. While one does not dismiss
the fact of ethnicities on the net, it is nevertheless necessary to make
a distinction between this and an ethnic characterization of the net
whereby the bogey of a dominant self is lent credibility and validity. I
would rather that we argue that the "Other" of the internet age is not
on the internet yet, that what I have refered to as the "New World
'Other' " is not geographically or ethnically inscribable, but part of
that mass which the netizen refers to as PONA, persons of no account,
those who have no access for any myriad of reasons, to the facilities
and structures of the internet. Outside of this territory, which is
human rather than strictly geopolitical, to think of any presences on
the internet as "Others" is to invite questions over who on the net
indeed has the right to selfhood and apart from whom anyone
else--everyone else--must be consigned to "Otherness"; who has the right
to confer this centrality and preeminence? If we can think
progressively--realistically--of a network of citizens, a new, digital
nationality albeit with varying levels and kinds of privilege,
difficulty, agenda, and concerns; if we can think more of difference
rather than dichotomy, only then are we truly able to imagine, and
indeed allow, a new territory and a new formation, a new order of
people. We cannot afford to state, quite glibly, that there are "others"
on the net, for to designate as "Other" is to brand--and to a certain
extent deny--significant contigents who arrive in this community of
peoples, sometimes at great cost and exertion, with the determination to
belong and to make their presence felt.
On the question of different web arts, just as there are no different
arts along geographical or ethnic lines, there are no different web arts
along those lines. all art is art and in an increasingly globalist
world, what separates one image, form, or artistic entity from another
is no longer strictly its provenance or any discernible national style
but the thematic concerns of its maker. In my lecture at the recent
forum on international contemporary art in Madrid, I pointed out that it
is an illusion to think of national arts or national styles with any
sense of purity or even discernibility, for what we may describe as
national styles are only possible within contenable societies with
centralized patron institutions that also serve as arbiters of taste.
The further we have moved from such formations, the more prominent the
individual element has become, the more untenable it has become also, to
think of national styles. The greater access that artists have to
exchange ideas and familiarize themselves with forms and practices
elsewhere, without the inhibiting presence of a monolithic patronage
system, the more regional or national speficities have eroded.
What possibly could be described as a Mexican style, for instance, or a
Chinese style, or a South East Asian style, or an American style, or a
Western style, without making the implausible mistake of grand
monolithism? What, stylistically, could possibly bind Jacob Lawrence and
Jeff Koons under the girdle of a national style; or indeed Kara Walker
and Lyle Ashton Harris. Or Ana Mendieta and Alexis Leyva? What might we
possibly claim for Carey May Weems that we may not also find in
Christian Botanski?
And the above within the parameters of the real world with its
shortcomings of mediated access and interzonality. With the very nature
of the internet as a thoroughfare, and the intense solitariness of
on-line engagement, it seems to me rather peculiar that any should speak
of, or indeed expect, "national" internet arts, or a "different web art"
except along the lines of individual styles. In same manner that we
cannot speak of the One and the Other on the internet, we likewise
cannot speak of national differences in web art in the age of the
itinerant artist.
Olu Oguibe
[ http://www.arts.usf.edu/~ooguibe ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
a critical forum for artistic practice in the network
texts are the property of individual authors
to unsubscribe, send email to eyebeam@list.thing.net
with the following single line in the message body:
unsubscribe eyebeam-list
information and archive at http://www.eyebeam.org
Eyebeam Atelier/X Art Foundation http://www.blast.org
-------------------------------------------------------------